Re: ZENZUR AUF/IN INTERNET ??? nicht dein ernst.. oder??


[ Reisen Cabo Verde - Kapverdische Inseln ]


Geschrieben von barbara am 26. Oktober 2001 00:11:32:

Als Antwort auf: Re: ZENZUR AUF/IN INTERNET ??? nicht dein ernst.. oder?? geschrieben von LuigiFogo am 26. Oktober 2001 00:04:38:

>>>>>Ich habe heute versucht ein Englische Text, über BIN LADEN in Forum zu stellen....
>>>>>Er ist nie durgegangen......
>>>>>Es bedeutet fuer mich das der SERVER von ALFRED ein filter eingebaut hat.... das ist eine verstos gegen die MEINUNG FREHEIT, die soviel ich weis in Grundgesetz verankert ist.... lass euch das nicht bitten...
>>>>>Wach auf...
>>>>>Luigi der wütend ist !!!!!!!!!!
>>>>hey, ruhe, ruhe...
>>>>glaube kaum, dass das der fall ist...
>>>>wird garantiert einen anderen grund haben,d ass der text nicht durchging... (warum ein text über schily auf englisch???)
>>>>das grundgesetz ist partiell eine farce, das wissen wir, aber mit aufwachen und wut glaub ich ist das etwas überbewertet...
>>>>bei dem, was wir hier in diskussionen an worten hatten, hätte ein eventueller filter schon hundertmal reagiert....
>>>Na ich sage es es war nicht über Schylli..
>>>Ich mache ein versuch...
>>>Brzezinski Admits Afghan Islamism Was Made in Washington Via NY Transfer News Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
>>>And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention. Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
>>>B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
>>>Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
>>>B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.
>>>Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentlaism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
>>>B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
>>>Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
>>>B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
>>
>>DU SAGTEST ABER IN DEINER EINEN MAIL:: SCHILY::!!! VERSTEHE DAS ALSO NICHT:::
>>UND ANSONSTEN:: SIEHSTE:::?? ES KOMMT EBEN DOCH AN::
>
>ES KOMNT AN WEI ICH BIN LADEN UND DIE LINKS NICHT GESENDET HABE !!!!!!!
>Fragt Alfred wieviele mal ich versucht habe der GANZE TEXT zu senden !!!!!


+++++++++++++
glaube das dennoch nicht... irgendworan muss man schliesslich noch glauben...




Antworten:


[ Reisen Cabo Verde - Kapverdische Inseln ]