Re: ist es so richtig?
Geschrieben von LuigiFogo am 26. Oktober 2001 03:14:17:
Als Antwort auf: ist es so richtig? geschrieben von alfred am 26. Oktober 2001 03:07:21:
>CIA Trained & Armed Bin Laden
>Links gehen nicht - schon erklärt
ACH SO???? UND WARUM NICHT UND ERZÄHLE MIR/UNS NICHT DAS MÄRCHEN VON HTLM CODIERUNG.......
>Brzezinski Admits Afghan Islamism Was Made in Washington Via NY
>Transfer News Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of
>history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say,
>after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the
>reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed,
>it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive
>for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
>And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I
>explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a
>Soviet military intervention. Q: Despite this risk, you were an
>advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this
>Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
>B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but
>we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
>Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that
>they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United
>States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was
>a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
>B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had
>the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want
>me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the
>border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of
>giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.
>Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic
>fundamentlaism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
>B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or
>the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the
>liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
>Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated:
>Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
>B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to
>Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. But what is there
>in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco,
>Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism?
>Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
>War das alles? Mehr war auch nicht im Mail.
>Wenn Du einen neuen Computer möchtest, dann wende Dich bitte an mailto:alex@paprottka.com Bestell schöne Grüße von mir, dann bekomm ich auch Prozente!!!DER GANZE TEXT !!!!!!!