Test für Luigi.....
Geschrieben von Daniel am 26. Oktober 2001 20:14:44:
Also, habe gerade den Text mit Links problemlos auf CaboVerde24-Test-Forum gestellt.
Jetzt hier nochmal der Versuch, um meine Vermutung hoffentlich zu bestätigen, dass hier auch kein Filter aktiv war.
CIA Trained & Armed Bin Laden
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-091701scheer.column
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/madeinwash.html
Brzezinski Admits Afghan Islamism Was Made in Washington Via NY Transfer
News Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA
aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet
army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded
until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to
him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet
military intervention. Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this
covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war
and looked to provoke it?B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but
we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they
intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States
in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of
truth. You don't regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the
effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to
regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote
to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR
its Vietnam war.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentlaism,
having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or
the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the
liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated:
Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to
Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. But what is there in
common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco,
Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism?
Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/madeinwash.html